Published on:

We can all agree that NFL apparel is expensive.  A new lawsuit against the NFL claims that antitrust violations are a big part of the reason.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against the National Football League (NFL) and sports merchandise leader Fanatics in a Manhattan federal court. An Illinois resident accuses the NFL and its 32 teams of conspiring with Fanatics, based in Jacksonville, Florida, to monopolize the online retail market for licensed sports merchandise like jerseys and t-shirts. The suit claims this has led to consumers paying artificially high prices due to stifled competition.

The lawsuit alleges that instead of engaging in competitive sales, the NFL and its teams have effectively given Fanatics exclusive control over the market, with the sports merchandise company sharing its monopoly profits with the teams. This arrangement is said to have disadvantaged other retailers.

Published on:

Roundup lawsuit have been going on for over 8 years now. This is the story of the Roundup litigation, what plaintiffs can do in 2024, and an update on the latest spate of Roundup NHL verdicts nationwide.

Lawsuits regarding the Roundup weed killer allege that Monsanto’s herbicide led to the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or similar cancers in individuals. Plaintiffs claim that Monsanto and its parent company, Bayer, failed to disclose the potential cancer risks associated with the product to the public. Moreover, these legal actions assert that the company deliberately misled the public about Roundup’s safety.

Referred to in litigation as the “Monsanto Papers,” internal communications from Monsanto revealed potential concealment of Roundup’s cancer connection over an extended period. These documents purportedly displayed evidence of the company’s amicable relationships with regulators and tactics employed to suppress scientific evidence linking glyphosate to cancer.

Published on:

If you’ve undergone Tepezza treatment for an eye condition and experienced subsequent hearing issues like hearing loss or ringing in the ears (tinnitus), you might have grounds for a lawsuit and get financial compensation. Tepezza, a recently approved drug for thyroid eye disease treatment, has been shown to cause permanent hearing loss in some patients.

Those who received Tepezza and suffered hearing damage are now pursuing product liability lawsuits. Our legal team is actively pursuing cases related to Tepezza-induced hearing impairment across all 50 states. Reach out to us today at 800-322-3010 to determine if your situation qualifies.

UPDATES:

Published on:

A class action lawsuit has been filed against American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. The lawsuit accuses these companies of imposing anti-competitive practices in the credit card market.  The plaintiffs’ lawsuit is based on a combination of federal and state antitrust laws, state consumer protection statutes, and claims of unjust enrichment.

This week, a group of debit card users has achieved class certification in a lawsuit against American Express Co. The class, representing users from 11 states and the District of Columbia, alleges that American Express’s rules have indirectly inflated rival card costs.

What Is the American Express Lawsuit About?

The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, represents a collective action on behalf of millions of consumers and entities who have used electronic payment methods other than American Express cards. The plaintiffs allege that American Express’s Anti-Steering Rules in its merchant agreements have unreasonably restrained trade and inflated prices in the credit and charge card transaction market.

Published on:

Recent findings have revealed elevated levels of harmful heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, and mercury, in numerous prominent baby food brands. These toxic substances are known to induce neurological and other health issues in developing children. The ingestion of these hazardous baby foods is suspected to be associated with the onset of conditions such as ADHD and autism.

Our legal team specializing in toxic baby food cases is currently open to new claims from children who suffered injuries or negative effects due to the consumption of these unsafe baby foods. If your child was fed Gerber brand baby food or “Earth’s Best” brand baby food and subsequently diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD or ADHD), autism, or another form of neurological disorder, contact our product liability attorneys today. You may be eligible for financial compensation.

Heavy Metals Found in Baby Foods

Published on:

Lawsuits are being filed across the U.S. claiming that cow-milk based baby formula has caused many premature infants to develop a serious gastrointestinal infection called necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The basis for these lawsuits is that research has long shown that cow milk is associated with NEC in premature infants, and the manufacturers of formulas such as Similac and Enfamil should have warned doctors and parents of the risks. Our firm is currently seeking NEC formula lawsuits.  Plaintiffs who bring successful baby formula NEC lawsuit could receive significant financial compensation. 

Formula Can Cause Increased Risk of NEC in Premature Infants 

Infant formula products such as Similac or Enfamil are made from cow milk and given to newborn babies as a substitute for human breast milk.  A growing body of scientific evidence has proven cow milk formulas significantly increase the risk of a life-threatening bowel infection called necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) when given to premature infants. 

Published on:

In 2021, the surgical implant manufacturer Exactech announced a recall of all its Optetrak® implant systems used in total knee replacement surgeries since 2004. The recall came after the company discovered that a problem with the product packaging was causing the polyethylene insert component in the Optetrak implants to degrade not function properly. This defect is causing the Optetrak knee implant systems to prematurely fail which ultimately requires patients to undergo additional revision surgery.

Individuals who had the Exactech Optetrak system implanted and suffered premature failure due to this defect can file a product liability lawsuit against Exactech and potentially recover financial compensation for their pain and medical bills. Our firm is currently accepting Optetrak implant failure cases from patients who suffered a premature failure to their knee replacement implant and had to undergo revision surgery.


UPDATES:

Published on:

The Bard PowerPort is an implanted port catheter device positioned just beneath the skin to facilitate easy attachment to a catheter for the intravenous administration of fluids or medications. Unfortunately, the Bard PowerPort possesses inherent design and manufacturing flaws, increasing its susceptibility to fracturing and shifting from its intended position. This defect has the potential to result in severe injuries, including internal vascular damage. 

Individuals who have suffered injuries due to a faulty Bard PowerPort device are pursuing product liability lawsuits against the manufacturer responsible for producing these implants. Our law firm is actively receiving cases from individuals who have had a Bard PowerPort catheter device implanted and subsequently experienced injuries resulting from fracture, migration, or other malfunctions of the implant. 

About the PowerPort 

Published on:

Most class action lawyers will tell you 2023 was underwhelming.  The 3M earplug settlement was a disappointment.  Johnson & Johnson’s unsuccessful attempt to push talc claims into bankruptcy did not catalyze a significant settlement. Frustratingly, the hernia mesh has not advanced to settlement even after the plaintiffs’ wins at trial.

In 2024, we expect more settlements in mass torts.  Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, Roundup, Paraquat, and AFFF are all ripe for settlement in 2024.  Let’s talk about what is out there.


PACER MDL Docket Links

MDL ECF LINK CASE #
3M Earplugs N.D. Florida 3:19-md-2885
AFFF D. South Carolina 2:18-mn-2873
Bard PowerPort D. Arizona 2:23-md-03081
Camp Lejeune E.D. North Carolina 7:23-cv-00897
CPAP W.D. Pennsylvania 2:21-mc-1230
Exactech E.D. New York 1:22-md-03044
Gardasil W.D. North Carolina 3:22-md-03036
Hair Relaxer N.D. Illinois 1:23-cv-00818
Hernia Mesh (Bard) S.D. Ohio 2:18-md-2846
NEC Formula N.D. Illinois 1:22-cv-00071
Paragard IUD N.D. Georgia 1:20-md-2974
Paraquat S.D. Illinois 3:21-md-3004
Roundup N.D. Cal. 16-md-2741
Talcum Powder D. New Jersey 3:16-md-02738
Tepezza N.D. Illinois 1:23-cv-03568
Zantac S.D. Florida 20-md-2924

Roundup Lawsuits

Not long ago, Roundup stood as the most widely used lawn and gardening product. However, this changed with the emergence of scientific studies linking the chemical glyphosate in Roundup to cancer.

This revelation triggered a surge in Roundup product liability lawsuits. Between 2018 and 2019, Monsanto/Bayer took three huge Roundup verdicts and began settling large groups of cases to the tune of nearly $11 billion.

Subsequently, Bayer shifted away from settlement strategies, opting to take cases to trial nationwide. Initially successful, Bayer won a string of victories.  Did it choose to take the leverage and settle? No.  Bayer got greedy and took five verdict in a row late last year, totaling over $2 billion.

If Bayer is not scared now, they are foolish.  They would smart to make settlement offers soon, before the next Philadelphia trial starts in January 2024.

Add-a-heading-2-300x75

The biggest mass tort in recent years is clearly the Camp Lejeune water contamination litigation, There are over 110,000 administrative claims and more than 1,000 civil lawsuits pending. In September 2023, the government introduced an early settlement program for eligible claimants, and the upcoming year may witness the first trials in this litigation.

We have already had a smattering of Camp Lejeune settlements.  Legal experts anticipate that 2024 will be marked by substantial settlements in the Camp Lejeune litigation, likely amounting to billions in settlement payouts.

Add-a-heading-4-300x75

The Paraquat lawsuits assert that prolonged exposure to this industrial herbicide leads to Parkinson’s disease. The Paraquat class action MDL has rapidly burgeoned into one of the fastest-growing mass torts over the past two years. Although the growth rate tapered off towards the close of 2023, the upcoming year, 2024, holds pivotal significance for this litigation.

Currently, nearly 5,000 cases reside within the Paraquat MDL, with a potential addition of another 2,000 cases in 2024. The strength of the Paraquat cases is evident, and the inaugural bellwether trials are anticipated to commence in 2024. This suggests the prospect of an impending Paraquat settlement in 2024, given the severity of Parkinson’s disease. As a result, the settlement payouts in these cases may be substantial.

We will have trial this year.  We are still waiting on a Daubert ruling that we anticipate will be a win for plaintiffs.  It is pretty easy to argue that Parkinson’s and Paraquat are connected.

Add-a-heading-5-300x75

The Paragard IUD lawsuits contend that a flaw in the IUD caused the retention arms to fracture inside the body during removal. Housed in the Northern District of Georgia under the oversight of Judge Leigh Martin May, this MDL has been among the slowest-moving mass tort class actions in our observance.

So while we exercise caution in predicting meaningful developments in 2024, the MDL must eventually see progress. Presently, the initial bellwether trials are scheduled for the conclusion of 2024.

Although progress within the MDL has been sluggish, the growth rate in the Paragard MDL has remained consistently robust. Approximately 500 new cases were added in 2023, and this rate of new cases is expected to persist in 2024, bringing the total cases in the MDL to around 2,200.

Add-a-heading-6-300x75

Lawsuits surrounding AFFF firefighting foam claim that exposure to this substance can lead to specific types of cancer. All federal court cases related to firefighting foam were consolidated into a new AFFF class action MDL situated in the District of South Carolina.

In August 2023, a global settlement deal was announced; however, disappointingly, it only encompassed cases concerning water contamination brought by local counties and water authorities. It did not extend to claims made by individuals who alleged developing cancer due to AFFF exposure.

Presently, there are 6,400 pending cases within the AFFF MDL, although the breakdown between water contamination and individual exposure cases remains unknown.

Speculation abounds following the global settlement of water contamination cases, hinting at the possibility of a global settlement deal for cancer cases.  Many AFFF lawyers are expecting a global AFFF settlement in the first half of 2024.  But, so far, nothing yet.

Add-a-heading-7-300x75

Lawsuits involving hernia mesh revolve around allegations that the mesh implants utilized in hernia repair surgeries were defective, resulting in complications and various injuries. The hernia mesh litigation encompasses several MDLs, with the most significant being the C.R. Bard MDL, which now houses over 20,000 pending cases.

Throughout most of 2023, there was minimal activity in the hernia mesh sphere. Recently, a verdict was delivered in the third bellwether trial, with a fourth trial scheduled for January 2024. Another favorable verdict for the plaintiff in this trial could generate substantial momentum for a global settlement in 2024. However, the complication arises from the substantial number of pending cases, presenting challenges in negotiating a global settlement in the hernia mesh lawsuits.

Add-a-heading-8-300x75

In October 2022, an impactful new study surfaced, revealing a correlation between regular usage of hair relaxer (a product widely used by millions of Black women in the U.S.) and an increased risk of uterine cancer. This revelation promptly initiated a surge of lawsuits regarding hair relaxer-related cancer, swiftly consolidated into a new class action MDL.

The substantial number of African American women in the U.S. who regularly use hair relaxers throughout their adult lives signifies the vast potential plaintiff pool in this case. 2023 witnessed an explosive expansion in the hair relaxer class action, ranking as the most rapidly growing mass tort nationwide during that year. The MDL commenced the year with fewer than 150 pending cases, and it is projected to conclude 2023 with over 9,000 pending cases. This escalating growth trend is expected to persist into 2024.

Add-a-heading-9-300x75

Suboxone, a medication utilized in treating opioid addiction and dependence, has seen extensive use in recent years. The latest version of Suboxone is in film form, designed to dissolve beneath the tongue. However, these sublingual films result in acute dry mouth, leading to severe tooth decay, tooth loss, and other dental issues. Initially, the manufacturer of Suboxone declined to include a warning about tooth decay on the drug’s product label, despite being well aware of the issue.

Only after the intervention of the FDA, urging the manufacturer to include a warning, did Suboxone’s label incorporate information about tooth decay. Thousands of Suboxone users experienced tooth decay and loss, prompting the initiation of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits alleging the manufacturer’s negligence in failing to provide adequate warnings.

The consolidation of Suboxone cases into a new class action MDL is imminent. Our firm receives hundreds of calls weekly regarding these cases. Based on the substantial volume of inquiries, it is confidently anticipated that this mass tort will gain significant traction in 2024. The addition of several thousand cases in 2024 is highly plausible given the current trajectory.

The exciting thing about the Suboxone cases?  The core of the lawsuit is that the defendants should have warned the plaintiffs of the risks.  In 2024, they are warning plaintiffs of the risk.  That makes the case a lot easier.

Add-a-heading-10-300x75

Lawsuits stemming from the CPAP machine recall arose after Philips recalled numerous CPAP and BiPAP devices used to treat sleep apnea. This recall was prompted by the discovery that the sound abatement foam in the machines emitted toxic chemicals, which users subsequently inhaled. As a result, CPAP lawsuits ensued and are continuously being filed.

At the commencement of 2023, the CPAP class action MDL held only 350 pending cases. Currently, the count has escalated to almost 800 pending cases, and the influx of new cases remains on the rise. Projections for 2024 in the CPAP class action anticipate a continuation of the current trend. Given the slower pace of this MDL, significant breakthroughs or major events in CPAP litigation for 2024 aren’t expected. Instead, a substantial increase in pending cases is anticipated.

Add-a-heading-11-300x75

Talcum powder lawsuits allege that prolonged exposure to talc found in products like baby powder leads to cancer. The talcum powder class action against Johnson & Johnson stands as the second-largest mass tort MDL in the country, boasting 53,311 pending cases as of November 2023.

The year 2024 holds potential for a significant turn in talcum powder litigation as a major global settlement deal from J&J could materialize. Presently, J&J’s settlement offers are perceived as insufficient, offering only $9 billion for over 50,000 cases, falling short of resolution. Simultaneously, talcum powder cases are proceeding to trial, yielding substantial verdicts nationwide, compelling J&J to address and resolve this mounting pressure.

Add-a-heading-12-300x75

Tepezza, a new prescription drug used for treating thyroid eye disease (TED), has been linked to cases of permanent hearing loss among patients receiving Tepezza injections. Consequently, a growing number of lawsuits have been filed nationwide against the manufacturer for failing to warn about this risk. Recently, federal court Tepezza lawsuits have been consolidated into a new class action MDL. With fewer than 100 pending cases currently, 2024 is expected to witness significant growth in the Tepezza litigation.

Published on:

Thousands of women have filed lawsuits alleging chemicals in their hair relaxer products caused them to develop cancer. On this page we will explain who qualifies to file a hair relaxer lawsuit. We will also look at the primary injuries being alleged by plaintiffs in the hair relaxer cases.

What are the Hair Relaxer Lawsuits About?

Recent scientific findings have unveiled a potential correlation between prolonged hair relaxer usage and elevated occurrences of uterine cancer. Uterine cancer, ranking as the fourth most prevalent cancer among women, sees around 65,000 new cases reported annually in the United States, representing about 3.5% of all cancer cases. Notably, the incidence of uterine cancer in Black women is twice as high as in White women in the country.