Published on:

Sexual abuse lawsuits at College Hospital in Cerritos, California, are being investigated by survivors and families who allege that vulnerable psychiatric patients were abused, assaulted, neglected, or placed in unsafe conditions while under the hospital’s care. These claims may involve abuse by staff, abuse by another patient, failure to supervise, failure to protect, failure to report, negligent hiring, negligent retention, dependent adult abuse, and institutional negligence.

College Hospital Cerritos is a locked psychiatric facility located in Cerritos, California. The hospital provides psychiatric services for patients of most ages, including people with mental health conditions and people with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are also dealing with psychiatric needs. That patient population is vulnerable by definition. When a facility accepts responsibility for those patients, it accepts responsibility for safety, supervision, staffing, reporting, and protection from abuse.

These cases go beyond the person who committed the abuse. A sexual abuse case against a psychiatric hospital usually turns on what the institution knew, what it should have known, and what it failed to do. Did the hospital ignore prior warning signs? Did staff fail to supervise a dangerous patient? Did employees fail to report abuse? Were vulnerable patients placed with unsafe roommates? Were complaints dismissed or minimized? Those are the questions that decide whether the hospital can be held responsible.

Published on:

Our lawyers are reviewing chlorpyrifos pesticide lawsuits for people diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease after years of pesticide exposure. These cases are still early. But the science and litigation have moved fast in 2026, and the adult Parkinson’s claims now have a much stronger foundation than they did a year ago.

Chlorpyrifos is an organophosphate insecticide sold for decades under product names that included Lorsban and Dursban. It was used in agriculture, pest control, orchards, row crops, greenhouses, nurseries, turf, and some older residential pest control applications. The lawsuits allege that manufacturers and sellers knew, or should have known, that repeated chlorpyrifos exposure could damage the nervous system and increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease, but failed to give users a fair warning.

Talk to Our Chlorpyrifos Lawyers

Published on:

If you have ever bought a product, signed up for a service, had your data exposed in a breach, used an app, received a marketing email, or dealt with a company that may not have been fully transparent, there is a real chance you qualify for a class action settlement.

Many of the settlements listed here do not require receipts or detailed documentation for at least part of the claim. These are commonly referred to as no proof class action settlements. That does not mean anyone can file. It means eligible class members may submit a claim by certifying that they purchased the product, used the service, received a breach notice, downloaded an app, received a qualifying email, or otherwise meet the settlement criteria.

This page focuses on current and upcoming class action settlements open to consumers in 2026. Most involve data breaches, privacy violations, misleading advertising, recurring fees, receipt privacy, video privacy, or unauthorized use of consumer information. Some allow a basic claim without receipts. Others allow a smaller payment without documentation but require receipts, account records, screenshots, bank records, or other proof if you want a larger reimbursement.

Published on:

For many years, courts across the country have been flooded with hernia mesh lawsuits. These product liability claims allege that certain permanent hernia mesh implants were defectively designed, inadequately tested, poorly labeled, or sold without proper warnings about the risk of serious complications after surgery.

The lawsuits involve several major medical device manufacturers, including Ethicon, C.R. Bard and Davol, Covidien, and Atrium Medical Corp. The cases are not true class actions. They are mostly individual personal injury lawsuits consolidated into separate federal multidistrict litigations, or MDLs, based on the manufacturer and product involved.

The hernia mesh litigation looks very different in 2026 than it did five years ago. Some defendants have resolved most of their claims. Bard has moved into settlement administration after a major global settlement framework, although claims are still being filed against Bard.

Published on:

A class action lawsuit was filed against American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. The lawsuit accused American Express of using anti-steering rules in its merchant agreements to stop merchants from encouraging customers to use lower-cost payment cards. Plaintiffs alleged that those rules inflated prices for consumers who used Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and debit cards, even if they never used an American Express card.

The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in 2019. It was litigated for years, certified in part, tried to a jury, and ultimately settled after trial. In July 2026, the court gave final approval to a $17.5 million settlement.

July 2026 American Express Settlement Update

Published on:

For the last few years, a number of lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (“J&J”) and Vogue International involving the OGX line of shampoo and hair care products. These lawsuits are based on allegations that certain OGX products contained DMDM hydantoin, a preservative that can release formaldehyde, and that the products caused hair loss, scalp irritation, allergic reactions, and other injuries.

July 2026 OGX Lawsuit Update

The OGX lawsuits are not as active as many people expected when these claims first received national attention in 2021. There has not been a large nationwide public settlement program paying substantial compensation to OGX users.

Published on:

Our lawyers are no longer accepting new AFFF firefighting foam cases at this time. This page provides the latest updates on the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits, the current status of MDL 2873, and our estimates of potential settlement amounts for plaintiffs with AFFF cancer and disease claims.

Aqueous film-forming foam, commonly called AFFF or firefighting foam, has been used for decades to suppress fuel fires. The problem is that many AFFF products contain PFAS chemicals, including PFOA and PFOS. These chemicals do not break down easily in the human body or the environment, which is why they are often called “forever chemicals.”

Scientific research has linked long-term PFAS exposure to serious diseases, including kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, thyroid cancer, liver cancer, and ulcerative colitis. People most often exposed include firefighters, airport workers, military personnel, industrial workers, and residents who drank water contaminated by PFAS from fire training sites, military bases, airports, or industrial facilities.

Published on:

In the world of antibiotics, Bactrim (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) stands as a powerful weapon against bacterial infections. It works great. This combination medication, composed of two active ingredients, has saved countless lives by combating a wide range of bacterial invaders.

However, beneath its lifesaving capabilities, Bactrim hides a potential complication – its role in contributing to yeast infections. In this comprehensive article, we delve into the mechanisms of Bactrim, the enigma of yeast infections (Candidiasis), and how the two intersect, shedding light on an often-overlooked aspect of antibiotic treatment.

Bactrim

Published on:

In recent years, churches and religious organizations have faced mounting liabilities related to civil sex abuse lawsuits. This page looks at civil sex abuse lawsuits involving the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, often referred to as the LDS Church or Mormon Church. We explain the legal claims that may be asserted to hold the LDS Church liable, the way these cases are moving in 2026, and the potential settlement value of Mormon Church sex abuse lawsuits.

If you were sexually abused in an LDS setting, you may have a civil claim even if the abuse happened years ago, even if no criminal charges were filed, and even if you are worried the deadline has passed. The first question is not whether you know the statute of limitations. The first question is what happened, who knew, what the Church did or failed to do, and whether there is still a legal path to compensation.

We are reviewing LDS abuse claims in 2026, including those that may be difficult on statute-of-limitations grounds. Do not assume you are too late before a lawyer looks at the facts, the state where the abuse happened, the defendant, and the available evidence.

Published on:

Dexcom glucose monitor lawsuits are being filed by people who say Dexcom continuous glucose monitoring systems failed when they needed them most. These claims involve Dexcom G6 and Dexcom G7 sensors, receivers, and mobile apps that allegedly provided inaccurate glucose readings, missed high- or low- blood sugar alerts, failed early, shut down without warning, or failed to alert users that a sensor had stopped working.

Our lawyers are looking for cases where this defect led to a serious injury.  When the device gives a wrong reading or fails to send a critical alert, the result can be hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, seizure, coma, hospitalization, or death.

The strongest Dexcom cases involve serious injury, documented device failure, medical treatment, app or receiver records, Dexcom support communications, lot or serial information, and a timeline that connects the device problem to the injury.