Published on:

By

If you have ever bought a product, signed up for a service, had your data exposed in a breach, used an app, received a marketing email, or dealt with a company that may not have been fully transparent, there is a chance you qualify for a class action settlement.

Many of the settlements listed here do not require receipts or detailed documentation for at least the basic payment. These are commonly referred to as no-proof class action settlements. That does not mean anyone can file. You still must honestly fit the settlement’s class definition.

This page focuses on class action settlements that remain open as of August 20, 2026. Some allow a basic cash payment without proof of financial loss. Others require a notice ID or allow the settlement administrator to confirm eligibility through company records. Documentation is usually required if you want reimbursement for larger losses.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Sacramento County youth detention sexual abuse lawsuits are civil claims brought by people who allege that they were sexually abused while confined in juvenile hall, housed in a county youth facility, or placed under county supervision as minors.

The legal case often extends beyond the individual perpetrator. Sacramento County or another operator may face liability when it failed to screen employees, ignored earlier complaints, allowed unsafe access to children, failed to report suspected abuse, or retaliated against a youth who tried to speak up.

This page also discusses certain Sacramento County foster placements because the former Warren E. Thornton Youth Center and the newer Welcome Homes are part of the county’s recent history of supervising vulnerable youth. Those placements were not juvenile detention facilities, and the legal claims may involve different departments, duties, records, and defendants.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, often called the LDS Church or Mormon Church, continues to face civil lawsuits alleging that church leaders, volunteers, members, and affiliated organizations failed to protect children from sexual abuse.

The central question in many of these cases is not only what the individual abuser did. Plaintiffs also ask what bishops, local leaders, youth-program officials, or central church representatives knew, whether they reported the abuse, and whether internal church systems protected the child or protected the institution.

LDS sexual abuse cases are not consolidated in one national class action or multidistrict litigation. They proceed as individual lawsuits under the law of the state where the abuse, reporting decisions, or institutional conduct occurred. That makes venue, clergy-confidentiality rules, filing deadlines, and the available evidence especially important.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

I cannot give you one headline for 2026 mass tort litigation without leaving out half the story. Depo-Provera lawyers reached an agreement in principle that could resolve a substantial number of meningioma claims. New federal proceedings were created for Dupixent, Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulators, Roblox child exploitation, Lyft passenger assaults, Cartiva implants, ByHeart infant formula, and GLP-1 vision loss cases.

There has been plenty of bad news, too. The Supreme Court handed Monsanto a serious preemption victory in the Roundup litigation. That ruling makes Bayer’s proposed settlement more attractive to some plaintiffs, even though many believe the proposed payments are too low. The first Paragard bellwether ended in a defense verdict. AFFF personal injury plaintiffs are still waiting for their first trial. Several older dockets look enormous on paper because settlement administration is slow work and cases remain in the federal count while releases, liens, dismissals, and payments are processed.

Here is where things stand for the rest of 2026. I have grouped the cases by what injured people actually need to know: which federal proceedings are moving, which new MDLs deserve attention, and which investigations remain too young for dependable predictions. Where a docket has reached settlement administration, I say that. Where I do not have a confident view yet, I say that, too.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Roblox sexual abuse lawsuits allege that the gaming platform exposed children to predators who used chat features, games, virtual currency, and friend requests to begin grooming them. In many cases, the predator allegedly moved the child from Roblox to Discord, Snapchat, text messaging, or another private channel before demanding explicit images or arranging an in-person meeting.

These lawsuits extend beyond the criminal conduct of individual predators. Plaintiffs contend that Roblox knew children were being targeted on its platform but failed to implement reasonable age verification, communication restrictions, moderation systems, reporting procedures, and parental controls in a timely manner.

Federal Roblox child sexual exploitation cases are consolidated in MDL No. 3166 before Chief Judge Richard Seeborg in the Northern District of California. The litigation is moving through early discovery, bellwether selection, and a major dispute over whether Roblox can force claims into private arbitration.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Bard PowerPort lawsuits allege that implanted catheter devices used during chemotherapy and other long-term treatments can fracture, migrate, cause serious infections, and contribute to dangerous blood clots.

The Bard PowerPort is placed beneath the skin and connected to a catheter that enters a major blood vessel. Plaintiffs claim that flaws in certain catheter materials can cause the device to deteriorate after implantation, exposing patients to vascular damage, emergency surgery, sepsis, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other serious injuries.

The federal lawsuits are consolidated in MDL No. 3081 in the District of Arizona. Bellwether trials began in April 2026. The first trial produced a partial defense result but left the central design-defect claim unresolved. The next trial, involving a fractured catheter, is scheduled to begin on August 18, 2026.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

For many years, courts across the country have been flooded with hernia mesh lawsuits. These product liability claims allege that certain permanent hernia mesh implants were defectively designed, inadequately tested, poorly labeled, or sold without proper warnings about the risk of serious complications after surgery.

The lawsuits involve several major medical device manufacturers, including Ethicon, C.R. Bard and Davol, Covidien, and Atrium Medical Corp. The cases are not true class actions. They are mostly individual personal injury lawsuits consolidated into separate federal multidistrict litigations, or MDLs, based on the manufacturer and product involved.

The hernia mesh litigation looks very different in 2026 than it did five years ago. Some defendants have resolved most of their claims. Bard has moved into settlement administration after a major global settlement framework, although claims are still being filed against Bard.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

For decades, millions of people used Johnson’s Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, and other talc-based body powders. Thousands of lawsuits now allege that repeated exposure caused ovarian cancer or mesothelioma and that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn consumers about the risks.

Mesothelioma claims generally allege that cosmetic talc was contaminated with asbestos. Ovarian cancer lawsuits focus largely on women who regularly applied talcum powder for feminine hygiene over many years. Johnson & Johnson denies that its talc products contained asbestos or caused cancer.

This page explains the proposed 2026 talc settlement, the current federal litigation, recent verdicts, potential claim value, and who may still qualify to file a lawsuit.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Los Angeles County is at the center of one of the largest government-run institutional child sexual abuse scandals in United States history. Thousands of claims involve children placed in county juvenile halls, probation camps, foster homes, group homes, and the former MacLaren Children’s Center.

Survivors allege that probation officers, facility employees, contracted caregivers, medical staff, and other adults sexually abused children who were under county supervision. Many claims also allege that complaints were ignored, reports were buried, and accused employees were transferred rather than removed.

Our law firm represents survivors of sexual abuse. If you were abused in a Los Angeles County juvenile facility, probation camp, foster care placement, or group home, call us at 888-322-3010 or request a free case review. We can review the facility, approximate dates, deadline, and available evidence.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Millions of young people have passed through state and county juvenile detention facilities across the country. Recent lawsuits and investigations have exposed what many of these children endured behind locked doors. Juvenile detainees have alleged rape, sexual assault, coercion, grooming, unwanted touching, and retaliation by guards, counselors, contractors, medical workers, and other staff members who were supposed to protect them.

A growing number of states have changed their laws to give childhood sexual abuse survivors more time to file civil lawsuits. In some states, survivors can bring claims decades after the abuse occurred.

Our sexual abuse lawyers handle juvenile detention center sex abuse cases nationwide. If you were sexually abused while confined in a juvenile facility, call us at 888-322-3010 or request a free case review to learn whether you may have a claim for financial compensation.

Continue Reading