Lawsuit Update Center
Talcum powder products like baby powder were once used on a daily basis by millions of people in the U.S. It was recently discovered, however, that many talc products contained small amounts of asbestos, which made them carcinogenic.
Thousands of people who developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after extended use of talcum powder products are now suing the manufacturer, Johnson & Johnson, alleging that it knew about the dangers of talc and failed to warn them.
On this page we will look at the talcum powder cancer lawsuits and their potential settlement value.
If you have a potential talcum powder claim, call our talc cancer lawyers today at 888-310-3032 or contact us online.
RECENT TALC LAWSUIT NEWS AND UPDATES
July 1, 2025: Talc MDL Hits 62,123 Cases in Post-Bankruptcy Filing Boom as Plaintiffs Regain Momentum
As of today, the talcum powder MDL in New Jersey has crossed 62,000 cases—62,123 to be exact. That is 1,331 new filings in just a month, making it the second straight month of serious growth.
This is the post-bankruptcy surge. When J&J’s third bankruptcy ploy collapsed in early 2024, it took the lid off this litigation. No cap on claims. No settlement framework. Just a wide-open MDL and thousands of lawyers who are done waiting for a fake-out resolution plan.
The pace is not just about volume—it is about timing. Plaintiffs’ firms know the game. File now, not later. Especially with no federal bellwether trials on the calendar and state courts like Missouri and California quietly moving their dockets forward.
This latest spike tells you something simple and loud: no one thinks this is over. And as long as J&J continues to delay a meaningful resolution, the plaintiff side will continue to file, and likely start trying more of these cases in state court. Because when 62,000 people are still suing you for cancer, the defense strategy of “let us wait this out” starts to look more like “let us lose control.” J&J is acting very tough on settlement right now, pushing off any efforts to get a mediator. But that could change in a hurry if we see a big verdict in the first MDL trial.
June 2, 2025: J&J Bankruptcy Plan Collapses, MDL Surges Past 60,000 Cases
Johnson & Johnson’s latest attempt to end the talc powder litigation through bankruptcy protection has officially collapsed—and with it, the $8.9 billion global settlement proposal they had pinned their hopes on. The courts saw through the maneuver, rejecting it as a misuse of the Chapter 11 process. As expected, the litigation is now back in high gear.
As of June 1, 60,792 active lawsuits are pending in the federal talc MDL (No. 2738) in New Jersey. That is a net increase of 1,221 cases from the prior month. The bump is not surprising. What is more telling is the renewed activity across the docket: stayed cases are being reopened, discovery disputes are resurfacing, and trial preparation is once again a real topic of conversation. There is also a new mass tort consolidation opening up in state court in Pennsylvania. This litigation is escalating into full-blown litigation once again.
With bellwether cases expected to restart and state court claims gaining steam, J&J will have to make some hard decisions. Do they litigate to verdict and risk runaway jury awards? Or return to the settlement table under less favorable conditions? Our lawyers think these cases settle soon. Plaintiffs’ lawyers called J&J’s bluff, and now it is time for them to put more money on the table that will be delivered over a shorter time horizon and get this deal done.
But unless a global deal emerges soon, 2025 may be the most consequential year yet for this litigation. The bankruptcy clock ran out. Now the trial clock is ticking.
April 11, 2025: Bankruptcy Dismissed Again — Talc MDL Resumes with Daubert Fights and Trial Planning
Now that the bankruptcy strategy is off the table—again—the talcum powder MDL is back in gear. J&J’s third attempt to resolve the litigation through a subsidiary’s Chapter 11 filing failed in late March, and with no appeal planned, the stay on federal litigation has been lifted. The court and the parties are now looking to pick up where they left off, with pretrial motions and trial logistics at the forefront.
The main event at this stage is the batch of expert challenges filed last summer. These Rule 702 motions are fully briefed, and the parties agree they need to be resolved first. What gets through Daubert will shape how plaintiffs prove causation, and whether these cases can reach a jury at all.
Trial planning is also back on the agenda. The plaintiffs want to consolidate two cases with overlapping issues for the first bellwether. J&J is opposed, of course, and wants the court to stick with a single-plaintiff format. Meanwhile, plaintiffs’ lawyers are proposing new deadlines for plaintiffs to submit profile forms, while J&J continues to press (understandably, actually) for dismissal of deficient cases.
Judge Shipp is expected to schedule a case management conference soon, and the first MDL trial could follow not long after unless there is a settlement.
Talcum Powder
Talcum powder, also known as talc powder, is a soft, fine, and white powder that is commonly used for various personal and industrial applications. It is composed of the mineral talc, which is a naturally occurring mineral primarily consisting of magnesium, silicon, and oxygen. Talc has been used for centuries for its unique properties and versatility.
Talcum powder is most commonly associated with baby powder. It has been widely used for generations to keep babies’ skin dry and prevent diaper rash. The fine texture of talc makes it effective in absorbing moisture. Adults also use talcum powder as a body powder to absorb sweat and reduce friction, particularly in areas prone to chafing.
Talc is a common ingredient in cosmetics, including face powders, blushes, and eyeshadows. Its soft and smooth texture helps these products apply more easily and evenly on the skin.
Talc Products Linked to Cancer
Fairly recently, it was discovered that talc is often contaminated with trace amounts of asbestos. Asbestos and talc are both naturally occurring minerals that are mined out of the earth. Certain sources of talc that are used in consumer products were contaminated with asbestos. Asbestos is one of the most notorious carcinogens in the world. The asbestos contamination of talc meant that individuals who used talcum powder products on a daily basis were unknowingly exposing themselves to asbestos for years.
Evidence has specifically linked long term use of talcum powder products to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer that is only known to be caused by exposure to asbestos.
Talcum powder products can cause ovarian cancer in women who use the talc products on their vagina over many years. When talcum powder products such as baby powder or shower-to-shower are applied to the vagina on a regular basis, specks of talc can travel into the ovaries from the fallopian tubes. These dangerous talc particles can remain lodged in a woman’s ovaries for years, eventually causing ovarian cancer. Studies have shown that regular use of talcum powder products can increase the risk of ovarian cancer by 20-30%.
Talcum Powder Class Action Lawsuit
The evidence showing that regular use of talcum powder products could cause mesothelioma and ovarian cancer sparked a growing wave of talcum powder lawsuits across the country. Most of the talc lawsuits were brought against Johnson & Johnson, the maker of iconic talc products such as Baby Powder.
The talc lawsuits alleged that J&J and other talc manufacturers knew or should have known about the potential dangers of talc for a long time, but negligently failed to warn consumers about this risk.
The talcum powder lawsuits against J&J in federal courts were consolidated into a class action MDL in the District of New Jersey. The talcum powder MDL now has almost 50,000 cases, making it the second largest consolidated mass tort in the U.S.
Talcum Powder Verdicts
Since the talcum powder lawsuits first began, a number of cases have gone to trial. Almost all of these trials have resulted in big victories for the plaintiffs with large damage awards. Below is a summary of some of the most notable recent talcum powder verdicts:
| Date | Verdict | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| October 2024 | $15 million | Evan Plotkin v. Johnson & Johnson: A Connecticut jury awarded $15 million to the plaintiff, finding that J&J’s talcum powder caused Plotkin’s mesothelioma. The award included $5 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages. The jury also recommended additional punitive damages, to be determined by the judge. |
| June 2024 | $260 million (overturned) | Kyung Lee v. Johnson & Johnson: An Oregon jury awarded $260 million to the plaintiff, finding that J&J’s talcum powder caused Lee’s mesothelioma. The award included $60 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages. However, the verdict was later overturned by a judge who cited “numerous egregious errors” by the plaintiff’s attorneys. |
| October 2023 | $18 million | A California jury awarded $18 million to a plaintiff who claimed talc powder caused her mesothelioma. |
| August 2023 | $10 million | A Missouri jury awarded $10 million to a woman who developed ovarian cancer after long-term use of talc powder. |
| May 2023 | $5 million | A New Jersey jury awarded $5 million to a plaintiff who claimed talc powder was linked to her ovarian cancer. |
| March 2023 | Defense Win | A jury in Illinois sided with the defense, ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove talc powder caused her cancer. |
| January 2023 | $2.2 billion | A Missouri jury awarded $2.2 billion to 22 women who claimed talc powder caused their ovarian cancer. |
Who Is Eligible to File a Talcum Powder Lawsuit?
If you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma as a result of regular use or exposure to talc-based products, it is advisable to seek the guidance of an attorney. Whether your talc exposure to asbestos occurred through industrial or consumer use, you may be eligible for compensation. Additionally, if you have lost a loved one to cancer following asbestos exposure, you may also qualify to file a talc claim.
The eligibility to file a talc lawsuit is contingent upon your state’s statute of limitations. For wrongful death talc lawsuits, the average statute of limitations is approximately two years from the date of the cancer patient’s demise. Given that it typically takes 20 to 60 years from the initial asbestos exposure for detectable cancer symptoms to develop, seeking legal advice promptly is imperative.
Contact Our Talc Lawyers Today to File Your Case
It is NOT too late to file your talcum powder lawsuit. If you used a talcum powder product for an extended period and were subsequently diagnosed with ovarian cancer, call our talc lawyers at 888-310-3032 or contact us online.
